Don’t Believe the Hype. You Do NOT Have to Go Green

by Dave Conrey

I’ve met quite a few people that don’t have the slightest interest in pursuing a green lifestyle. They would sooner pour crude oil in their eyes than live by the light of a compact fluorescent bulb (shameless self promotion). People can be reluctant, apathetic or flat out lazy about lifestyle changes that hint of making even the slightest impact on their life, regardless if that impact is good or bad. I know because I am a former reluctant, apathetic, lazy bastard, still am sometimes, but getting better, and I’ve got a message for the rest of those people.

Fine, be that way.

You really don’t have to buy a single light bulb, bamboo t-shirt, hemp grocery bag or compact hybrid vehicle. You don’t have to buy a single green product your entire life and you can still have a positive affect on the environment as long as you do just one thing. Don’t buy anything.

Check Your Brain, You’ve Been Greenwashed

Of course you’re going to buy things. I buy things, probably too many things, but instead of my normal quest to have the next hot gadget, I’m being a bit more conscious of my purchases. Our obsession with consumerism is largely why we’re in this global warming predicament in the first place. The more stuff we buy, the more needs to be manufactured, the more energy we expend.

Buying green products helps improve the situation, but only if we’re buying out of necessity instead snatching up all the cool, new things we want. Another problem with our green consumption is that corporations are now lining up to make the next great “green” product, or so they would have you believe. Really, they just want you to buy more of their stuff, and sometimes that stuff isn’t nearly as green as they make it sound. The popular term for this is Greenwashing and we’re all susceptible, including some of our most beloved celebrities who we look up to for what is cool about sustainable living.

With Leonardo DiCaprio and George Clooney driving around town in their shiny new Toyota Prius’, we tend to bank on their celebrity currency instead looking at all the facts, but dig a little deeper and that currency falls as flat as stock shares in Lehman Brothers. Based on a paper written by James Martin, President of the 60 Plus Association, about the Hidden Costs of Driving a Prius, despite the awesome gas mileage, the actual energy usage to get a Prius to market far exceeds any benefit of making the purchase in the first place.

The nickel for the battery, for instance, is mined in Sudbury, Ontario, and smelted at nearby Nickel Centre, just north of the province’s massive Georgian Bay. Toyota buys about 1,000 tons of nickel from the facility each year, ships the nickel to Wales for refining, then to China, where it’s manufactured into nickel foam, and then onto Toyota’s battery plant in Japan. That alone creates a globe-trotting trail of carbon emissions that ought to seriously concern everyone involved in the fight against global warming. All told, the start-to-finish journey travels more than 10,000 miles - mostly by container ship, but also by diesel locomotive.

And that doesn’t even touch on the dramatic effects the nickel mining and smelting have on the environment. Both the mine and the smelting plant pump sulfur dioxide into the air killing off all the vegetation in the area. What isn’t done in by the greenhouse gasses is finished off by severe acid rain. Killing off all the plant life also created mass erosion making the soil on the hillsides fall. The most ironic part of the Prius greenwashing is that we’d probably be better off driving Hummers instead.

A ‘Dust to Dust’ study by CNW Marketing Research of Bandon, Ore., shows the overall eco-costs of automotive hybrids may be even higher…To put the data into understandable terms for consumers, CNW translated it into a ‘dollars per lifetime mile’ figure, or the energy cost per mile driven. When looked at from that perspective, the Prius and other hybrids quickly morphed from fuel-sippers into energy-guzzlers. The Prius registered an energy-cost average of $3.25 per mile driven over its expected life span of 100,000 miles. Ironically, a Hummer, the brooding giant that has become the bête noir of the green movement, did much better, with an energy-cost average of $1.95 over its expected life span of 300,000 miles. And its crash protection makes it far safer than the tiny Prius.

They’re not saying go buy a Hummer. Instead consider the impact of the purchase you’re making. Although the Ford Focus doesn’t get you the gas mileage a Prius will, it has the highest fuel economy of any other American car at 24mpg city/35mpg hwy. Buying the American made Focus also means jobs for Americans, and the money earned stays in America, helping our economy. Where does the money go when you buy a Prius?

Also, being at least $10,000 cheaper than the Toyota Hybrid, depending on your commute, it could take you as many as 10 years to make your money back with the Prius’ gas savings, but we all know you’ll be buying a new car before then anyway, right?

There in lies the problem. Whether we own a Prius, a Focus or a Hummer, Americans are likely to ditch that car after only a couple years for the newer, hotter model. If instead you held onto that car, took good care of it and drove it for 10+ years instead of 3, not only would you save money by not having a car payment and cheaper insurance, you’d help the planet out by not consuming another vehicle (or two) in that lifetime.

That same ideology could be applied to your entire life. Do you really need those black leather pumps when you have 3 other pair in the closet collecting dust? Do you need a new set of golf clubs because your golf buddies all have the new Calloways? I want a 50″ flat-panel display with surround sound speakers, but I find it hard to justify when my 32″ big box tv works just fine. Keeping up with the Joneses is at the core of global warming problem and if we’re not more careful, we’re going to consume our way into oblivion.

I’m not saying you need to be a miser. If you can afford new things and you want new things, by all means go for it. Just try to buy items that will last, and will make you happy for several years rather than just a few. If you do buy new things, don’t let the old ones collect dust in your garage or attic. Donate those to charity or Goodwill and let someone else have a crack at them.

Buying Vintage & Used

I remember a few years back when vintage clothing shops were everywhere. Buying a classic suit or a vintage Hawaiian shirt was all the rage. A lot of those shops are gone now and replaced by boutique shops filled with tons of new clothes fresh from the factories in China and Central America. As the economy goes further into the crapper, I’m guessing gently used clothing will be coming back into fashion, maybe not at brick-n-mortar shops, but definitely on eBay. There’s no shame in buying cool stuff that someone else took good care of before you.

Even better than buying that new Ford Focus would be to purchase one that’s a couple years old. I drive a Focus that I bought used. It’s now 8 years old, has well over 100k miles and except for some dings and scratches, it’s still kicking. Most used Hondas and Toyotas will give you years of good use and still get you reasonable if not great gas mileage. Maybe the body style is different than the new one, and maybe your friends will think you are broke because you bought a used car instead of new, but in the long run, you have a great car that will last you a long time, save you a lot of money and you’re not contributing as much to mass consumption.

To button this up, if I had to lend some amateur advice, I’d tell you to apply these ideals to as many aspects of your life. Don’t buy things if you don’t need them. If you must buy something, go for the gently used stuff first. If it must be a new product, put a little due diligence into the purchase and find out how and where the product is made. A little bit of research goes a long way and you can tell your treehugging friends that you’ve done your part.

I just found out that fellow greenie, Joel Bittle wrote a similar post over at Green Building Elements. Check out his take on this subject from a building perspective

Photo by Justified Sinner

Similar Posts:

{ 4 trackbacks }

Go green, drive a Hummer? | Ends of the World
09.25.08 at 7:11 pm
Quick Green Reads For The Weekend Volume Eighty Four. | The Good Human
09.26.08 at 6:00 am
Monday Link Love: Get Out and Vote Edition — Your guide to stylish, eco-friendly decor!
10.06.08 at 9:27 am
My Natural Furniture » Blog Archive » Green Blog Tour
11.18.08 at 7:49 pm

{ 33 comments… read them below or add one }

Joel 09.23.08 at 3:18 pm

Great article, Dave. I echoed your sentiment in an article I wrote called Finding Balance between Consumerism and Conservationism

Dave Conrey 09.23.08 at 3:36 pm

Thanks Joel. I included a link to the story.

David 09.23.08 at 4:37 pm

I agree so much with you - this greenwashing fad is absurd - but people love to buy stuff, whether they need it or not. It is unfortunate that folks can’t just stop buying things but they do it to fill a hole. And if some marketing guy can make them think they are helping the planet by, say, buying a can crusher or some other useless gadget, then it makes the average person feel better about themselves. Imagine the impact we could have if we stopped consuming. Forget CFL’s for a minute; just stop buying useless crap!

Dave Conrey 09.23.08 at 5:39 pm

Exactly. I’m glad I’m not talking out of my ass on this one. Sometimes I wonder, but thanks for the identifying comment. It’s a David thing.

Derek 09.23.08 at 7:20 pm

I’m with you, man. I try to choose the eco-option for the necessities, but don’t like the pressure to “green up” with green ($). My 20 year old truck with 200,000 miles on it has a way tinier footprint than any new hybrid electric hydrogen whatever. And my rebuilt 80’s bicycle is the most efficient transport ever…

Reduce comes before reuse and recycle. And it doesn’t cost anything.

I like the term “negawatt”. Using less is greener than buying a new “greener” thing.

Dave Conrey 09.23.08 at 7:43 pm

yeah, I only wish I lived close enough to my office to ride my bike to work. Thankfully, there’s plenty of places around town that I go within riding distance.

Martin 09.25.08 at 2:03 pm

How come the hummer was given a 300,000 mile lifespan and a prius a 100,000 mile lifespan? CNW says they decided on that number because a hummer driver will drive a lot more than a prius driver. No research to back that up, just CNW’s owner’s personal assumption! If this was about comparing cars honestly, then both should be taken with the same lifespan, which does make the Prius better than a Hummer.

Nevertheless, your point that other small cars are actually a lot better than a Prius makes sense to me. And I agree that reducing our consumption is much better than consuming a lot of “green” products.

Gabe 09.25.08 at 3:37 pm

Interesting, and thought provoking. One comment on the Hummer - I had heard a while back that the Hummer H2 has a 150% breakdown rate in its first year on the road. Yup, that’s right. Over 100%. So I do think that the idea of a hummer going 300K is a bit optimistic.

Dave Conrey 09.25.08 at 4:29 pm

Thanks Martin and Gabe. All that may be true about the Hummers, but I believe the paper only used the Hummer as a gauge to show how absurd the idea of a Prius being green really is. If they compared a Prius to a Honda Accord, it wouldn’t have made nearly the impact. The truth is, buying a Honda Accord, which I believe is made in America, would still be a much better purchase than a Prius, let alone the smaller more economical vehicles like the Ford Focus.

Panic 09.25.08 at 4:59 pm

This is a poor study. For one thing there is more nickel in the frame of a Hummer than in the batteries of the Prius.

Dave Conrey 09.25.08 at 7:27 pm

That could be true, but as I stated before, much of the steel in the Hummer, as well as most vehicles, is recycled from other scrapped vehicles. The nickel for the hybrid batteries are newly mined and smelted.

Again, the Hummer is used as a point of reference, a talking point. If you prefer, compare it to a a Toyota Yaris. The results are even greater.

Dave Conrey 09.25.08 at 7:30 pm

BTW, when I said compare “it” to a Toyota Yaris, I meant compare the Prius to the Yaris. (I wish I could edit my own comments).

Ed 09.25.08 at 8:40 pm

That CNW study has actually been de-bunked. You should look into it. Most people who have examined how the research was conducted have determined that it doesn’t have any validity.

The point that the prius was given a 100k life span when it has a 150k warranty was just one important flaw.

Tracy 09.25.08 at 10:17 pm

If you said to me, buy a used focus instead of a Prius, I could see the logic of the statement. If you said buy a Hummer instead of a Prius, you are an idiot. If I also said to you that I refuse to give any more money than absolutely necessary to people that want to kill me and my family for gas from oil then I hope you’ll understand why I buy the Prius.

design 09.26.08 at 4:53 am

Brilliant summary of how reducing consumption of goods, green or not, is the better way to be eco-conscious.

Dave Conrey 09.26.08 at 8:22 am

Thanks. I’m glad someone here can see the forest amidst the trees in this post.

Andy T 09.26.08 at 8:49 am

I wouldn’t be too concerned about the nit-picking posts Dave, some people (actually, a lot of people) like to argue just for argument’s sake.

Anyway, a good article and an important point well made. I was pondering the same point myself the other day but was thinking about mobile phones, it astounds me how we treat such a high-tech and resource-intensive item as so disposable; if you’re on a contract then you usually get a new handset upgrade every 12 or 18 months… I wonder how many fully working phones get thrown away every year?

carlos 09.26.08 at 8:57 am

Greenwashing is a diversion. Wallstreet doesn’t want anyone working on the real problem…Over-population. Besides, Wallstreet can make money with the green movement (ie: T. Boone Pickens)..
Think about it. None of this discussion would be necessary, if we had about half as many people…right?….Or alot less.. If you start to deal with over-population, you need to deal with the source of it. Here, in the USA, our population has doubled over the last 40 years. 97% of that growth has come from immigrants and the children, thereof. And what does Wallstreet use to keep the middle class down and unions at bay?…An endless supply of cheap labor. This is repeated in nearly all industrialized countries in the world.
Oh sure the economy has doubled in size as well. Creating jobs, and such…yeah right. According to the PEW institute, the stock population of America has not realized any of the benefits. The only winners have been Wallstreet and the immigrants (and even they have to live in ghettos), and politicians.
There is not a single social or environmental ill, that would not be mitigated by a systematic reduction in the human over burden. All systems have a finite carrying capacity. I need only point to Los Angeles with it’s failing schools, water shortages, traffic, bankrupt hospitals, over crowded jails (40% of the inmates are in the country illegally)……the list is endless.
Even the current mortgage crisis has a tie. The vast majority of foreclosures, are in the immigrant (mostly Hispanic) community. Stockton, Ca. (one of the 5 largest cities in Ca) is the foreclosure capital of America..It’s almost 100% Mexican. Wallstreet hustled them into ridiculous loans, now they want their ridiculous profits. The bailout money, will come from people who actually pay taxes……the stock population and their decendents. Most 1st and 2nd generation immigrants families are hardly getting by, and as such pay little or no federal taxes.
Anybody notice, how immigration has disappeared from the presidential campaigns? Could it be because, Wallstreet “owns” both parties?
I’m tired of typing…contact me at sleeko1@yahoo.com, if you need some resources to check my numbers.
Aloha, Carlos

Dave Conrey 09.26.08 at 9:23 am

Thanks Andy. I have thought about the cell phone issue myself. I admittedly have 2 old phone in my closet that I didn’t know what to do with. Now I know there are recycling programs, and I’ll probably do that, but cell phones are probably one of the most consumed products, and they’re not exactly all the great for the environment either.

Carlos - Even if the tone is a bit off-color, you’re right about overpopulation. It is a major problem, not so much in the U.S. as in other countries, but definitely a problem worth discussing. However, the issue with the U.S. is that we consume as much if not more than some of these overpopulated countries.

carlos 09.26.08 at 9:50 am

Dave,
And if we suddenly didn’t consume so much. Huge portions of those very same countries would starve. Either, we reduce world population intelligently, or mother nature will. And it won’t be pretty.
People are alot like atomic particles. Packing them tightly together, creates heat. Too tightly, and you get critical mass….Boom!
What’s off color about simple math?
C…

Dave Conrey 09.26.08 at 10:32 am

Well, when I say consume, I don’t mean just food. I mean products as well; a new car every 3 years, a new cell phone every 2, clothes, electronics, etc. We don’t just want a burger, we want the 1lb. double bacon cheeseburger and supersized fries.

Americans always want the bigger and better thing. As I said in the article, the more we buy, the more gets made, and along with that comes more pollution, more greenhouses gasses and more global warming.

I’m not at all discounting overpopulation as a major problem. These two problems go hand in hand. I was just going to reserve population for another conversation.

Uncle B 09.26.08 at 11:16 am

For all the Prius and Hummer fans out their: Detroit “heavy Iron” is dead - lighter carbon fiber, hemp fiber, and advanced polymer composites make stronger, more repairable more durable and mostly lighter car bodies that go further and faster per charge than heavy sheet Fe metal bodied, 1930’s grease pit tech of the GM Volt or Prius! Even Henry Ford was able to produce a practical, viable plastic car body way back in the early days! We need a tandem two seater carbon fiber, advanced polymer composite, aerodynamic car body driven by a biodiesel electric/ plug in system expressly designed for fast cheap commuting. We need laws banning SUVs. We need special lanes on freeways and down town for the much smaller, easy to park lightweight commuter cars. We need a design center of 10 to 12 years on the commuter cars, We need full retrofitting, by law on commuter cars. We need annual model changes banned, and only really technical improvements be allowed for model change. We need an honest for the people government’s control on commuter cars. If someone from China reads this, and they market honest commuter cars before the North American “Big Three” then the “Big Three” deserve to go broke and do not need government money to do it, the “Big Three” are on that track right now!

carlos 09.26.08 at 4:31 pm

I have no faith in Detroit.Except to build an over-priced pile of crap.
I drive a 1960 Falcon station wagon. It has a 170ci straight 6, and gets about 25mpg. I’ve had it since 1970. It has about a million miles on it.
I can’t wait for an Asian, Compressed Nat Gas / Electric Hybrid. Let’s hope it comes, before I’m too old, to drive.

Maxo 10.01.08 at 12:42 pm

Last winter my work shoes where on the brinks. I ordered some hemp shoes off the internet. The idea here being that these hemp shoes will last me longer. Shoes rarely last a year for me.
So far they have help up great. In about fifteen more months I will probably have to have them re-soaled, but I’m hoping they will last me a long time.

Dave Conrey 10.01.08 at 12:53 pm

Good to know Maxo. What brand/style shoe did you buy?

Maxo 10.01.08 at 12:59 pm

I ordered the shoes from downbound.com
http://www.downbound.com/No_Sweatshop_Hemp_Organic_Vegan_Shoes_p/pwt-e-msh1new.htm
The brand is Ecolution (http://ecolution.com/)
I’m not sure if you’ve researched the “green”ness of hemp, but the two main points are that it takes less water to grow, grows more per acreage, and last longer so help apparel does not have to be replaced as often.
If you click on the “About Us” link on the ecolution website, it goes on about all of the environmental friendly techniques they use.
The style of the shoe is very European, but I really like it.

Jennae @ Green Your Decor 10.02.08 at 5:23 pm

You make a great point, and I hope that all the people who have no desire to go green are listening. I know that my blog is a shopping blog, and for that reason, I try to tell readers all the time that the whole point is to consume less. But when you DO consume, buy products that have lifetime value instead of its cheap plastic counterpart that will have to be replaced in a short time.

I’m no saint…I still have the urge to buy a new cell phone even though my current one is dinged up but still working. But I”m glad that I know enough to stop myself. A few years ago, I used to go to the mall nearly every weekend and just buy “stuff.” Like everybody else. Now, I can’t remember the last time I bought something that wasn’t edible or absolutely necessary. I “window shop” on the internet all the time, but that’s as far as my shopping goes, in most cases.

Taryn Merrick 10.25.08 at 1:38 pm

So well said. To so many people it is “fashionable” or worse yet “profitable” to go green. They think they are eco conscious, but to be truly eco conscious one must respect nature as if it is as great or greater than us humans. Each bird, each blade of grass, each crystal, each plant, is precious. When one starts to think like that, *that* is being “green”.

Carlos 10.27.08 at 11:50 am

The “Greenest” thing anyone can do, is to work toward reduction of the human footprint. The most effective way is via population control.

Dave Conrey 10.27.08 at 12:54 pm

I’m sure that’s true, Carlos, but that’s a very long term project that takes entire nations to figure out. Reducing consumption can happen quickly and can be implemented at a very local level.

The Justified Sinner 10.31.08 at 3:34 am

Great article. Thought-provoking and really well-written. I am delighted to have my photograph used at the top of this.

Dave Conrey 10.31.08 at 8:05 am

Awesome, glad you enjoyed it, and thanks for making the photo accessible. I’m happy to share the link love.

Carlos 10.31.08 at 8:39 am

Sorry to harp about population control. I’m not into grabbing snakes, by the tail. The best way to kill a snake, is to cut off its head. Amnesty is NOT immigration reform…that’s just business, as usual.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>